Wednesday, 5 February 2014

Jewel Moore Plus Size Princess -Disney

Teen girl launches petition for Disney to create a plus-size princess - but is that an unhealthy ideal too?
  • High schooler Jewel Moore says Disney has the power to influence girls' confidence, and a plus-size princess would be a positive role model
  • But some have argued that the focus needs to be on having 'normal' princesses with realistic and healthy dimensions instead
PUBLISHED: 16:03 GMT, 31 January 2014 | UPDATED: 17:11 GMT, 31 January 2014
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
6,842 shares

A teenage girl has launched a petition for Disney to make a plus-size princess in the wake of controversy over whether the company promotes an unrealistic feminine ideal.
Jewel Moore, a high school junior from Farmville, Virginia, wrote on her Change.org page that since Disney has such a huge influence on young girls, it should create a princess with a curvy body to 'show support to a group of girls who are otherwise horrendously bullied by the media.'
But while many have praised her for trying to put a stop to body shaming, others have questioned whether a 'plus-size' princess - rather than simply a normal-size one - is a step in the wrong direction.
Fighting for a cause: Jewel Moore, a high school junior from Farmville, Virginia, who describes herself as 'plus-size', has launched a Change.org petition for Disney to create a plus-size princess
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/furniture/mobile/icon_camera_90x68.png+6
Fighting for a cause: Jewel Moore, a high school junior from Farmville, Virginia, who describes herself as 'plus-size', has launched a Change.org petition for Disney to create a plus-size princess
Body image: Citing the unrealistically skinny proportions of princesses like Ariel (left) and Jasmine, she says Disney should 'show support to a group of girls who are otherwise horrendously bullied by the media'
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/furniture/mobile/icon_camera_90x68.png+6
Body image: Citing the unrealistically skinny proportions of princesses like Ariel (left) and Jasmine (right), she says Disney should 'show support to a group of girls who are otherwise horrendously bullied by the media'
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/furniture/mobile/icon_camera_90x68.png+6
Body image: Citing the unrealistically skinny proportions of princesses like Ariel (left) and Jasmine (right), she says Disney should 'show support to a group of girls who are otherwise horrendously bullied by the media'
Jewel's petition, which has amassed 861 signatures so far, bears the title: 'Every body is beautiful'.
She writes that she created the page 'because I'm a plus-size young woman, and I know many plus-size girls and women who struggle with confidence and need a positive plus-size character in the media.'

More...
Citing research that 'a child's confidence correlates greatly with how much representation they have in the media,' she says a plus-size Disney princess would be a positive step towards body acceptance.
Many commenters have agreed with Jewel, leaving comments on the Change.org page to express their opinion.
Equality: Jewel's petition, which has amassed 861 signatures so far, bears the title: 'Every body is beautiful'
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/furniture/mobile/icon_camera_90x68.png+6
Equality: Jewel's petition, which has amassed 861 signatures so far, bears the title: 'Every body is beautiful'
Every body is beautiful: She wrote on the page: 'I'm a plus-size young woman, and I know many plus-size girls and women who struggle with confidence and need a positive plus-size character in the media'
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/furniture/mobile/icon_camera_90x68.png+6
Every body is beautiful: She wrote on the page: 'I'm a plus-size young woman, and I know many plus-size girls and women who struggle with confidence and need a positive plus-size character in the media'
'If young girls see that beauty comes in all shapes and sizes, they can change how society views it,' wrote one supporter
Another said: 'Having dealt with being overweight my entire life, I think that it would be great for Disney to make a more realistic princess for young girls to look up to.'
But some have taken issue with Jewel's emphasis on 'plus-size', asserting that the focus needs to be on having 'normal' princesses with realistic and healthy dimensions instead.
Misguided? While many have supported her petition, some have taken issue with her emphasis on 'plus-size', saying the focus needs to be on having 'normal' princesses with realistic and healthy dimensions instead
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/furniture/mobile/icon_camera_90x68.png+6
Misguided? While many have supported her petition, some have taken issue with her emphasis on 'plus-size', saying the focus needs to be on having 'normal' princesses with realistic and healthy dimensions instead
One parent wrote on CafeMom.com: 'Why do princesses have to be either weirdly skinny or plus size? Are there any petitions for normal sized princesses?'
'If girls are THAT impressionable I wouldn't want them looking up to overweight princesses'
The sentiment was shared by another mother, who said: 'Understandable. But at the same time do we want our daughters idolizing a plus sized princess either?
'If girls are THAT impressionable then I really wouldn't want them looking up to overweight princesses or idols. Why not just average sized? Not fat, not skinny.'


 Negative Feedback :
Name Removed
“I hate the term "plus-size" its merely a way to sugarcoat reality to fat, over weight people. Being over weight has just as much, if not more negative health issues short and long term compared to being slightly underweight.
Childrens self image is not at risk from disney. If anything it will just encourage them that princesses are not obese.
This is simply another attempt by fat people to try and validate and justify their unhealthy lifestyle so they don't feel guilty when they're too lazy to do something about it. They sit by the TV eating garbage rather than a healthy nutritious meal and exercising every once in a while.
Any fat person, given the chance, would take a thin physique over their fat one... They just don't want to work for it. When society accepts this mentality as ok, it drastically adds to the global health and financial epidemic of obesity.”


Tuesday, 28 January 2014

The Masterminds Behind the Phony Anti-Soda Tax Coalitions



The Masterminds Behind the Phony Anti-Soda Tax Coalitions
Posted: 07/03/2012 3:16 pm
React
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/images/bignews/follow-arrow.png
Follow
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/images/bignews/follow-arrow.png

share this story
71
7
Submit this story
Deja vu all over again?
In June, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg proposed a controversial cap on sugary drink portion sizes. If the proposal is passed, sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces will no longer be able to be sold in the city's restaurants, stadiums, food carts and movie theatres.
Last week, a so-called "grassroots" coalition, New Yorkers for Beverage Choices, emerged to oppose the mayor's measure. But an investigation by the Republic Report found that the coalition is entirely the creation of the American Beverage Association and its high-powered issue advocacy firm Goddard Gunster (formerly Goddard Claussen):
The group bills itself as a "coalition of citizens, businesses, and community organizations who believe that consumers have the right to purchase beverages in whatever size they choose."
But the "organizations" listed on the website simply run the gamut of businesses that sell soda, ranging from AMC Entertainment to the Chik-Fil-A.
Goddard Gunster is not a group of concerned citizens in New York City. It is based in Washington, D.C.


If this is all sounding familiar to you, you're not imagining things. Back in 2010,
the New York Times reported on a "grassroots" coalition dedicated to killing Governor David Paterson's proposed penny per ounce soda tax:
Enter New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes, set up by the beverage industry, grocers and the Teamsters, who work as drivers and in production. The organization's Web site describes it as a humble coalition of "hard-working individuals, struggling families and already burdened small businesses," like Benny's Pizza and Kay's Deli.

But behind the scenes, much of the strategic work came from Goddard Claussen, the public affairs company whose "Harry and Louise" commercials helped defeat President Bill Clinton's health care overhaul efforts. The company was retained by the American Beverage Association to lobby against the New York tax.
Goddard Claussen was so proud of killing the NYS soda tax that it highlighted its New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes coalition on its website with a full page write-up that boasted: "As part of a comprehensive outreach effort, we recruited over 10,000 citizens and 158 businesses to join New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes." Shortly after this web page was discovered by the media, it was removed from the website.
Goddard Gunster continues to promote its work derailing soda taxes. Subsidiary Goddard Claussen West currently highlights the California astroturf coalition it formed in 2009-10:
GC coordinated with the national effort (now known as Americans Against Food Taxes) and created a California coalition, Californians Against Food and Beverage Taxes (CAFBT). CAFBT initially recruited hundreds of supporters throughout the state including organizations whose leaders and members could serve effectively as spokespeople for the coalition in the press and as messengers to key legislators. The California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Neighborhood Market Association and California Retailers Association took lead roles in that regard.
If you're wondering about the national anti-soda tax coalition effort cited above, the Center for Media and Democracy's Source Watch has this to say about it:
Americans Against Food Taxes (AAFT) is a front group funded by the beverage industry, which consists of major restaurant chains, food and soft drink manufacturers and their associated lobbying groups. It was organized by the American Beverage Association to fight a proposed three to ten cent tax on soda, sugary drinks and energy drinks to help fund health care reform in the United States ... its extensive membership consists mainly of lobbying groups for packaged food and soda companies, chain restaurant corporations and the world's large food and soft drink manufacturers and distributors, including the Coca-Cola Company, Dr. Pepper-Royal Crown Bottling Co., PepsiCo, Canada Dry Bottling Co. of New York, the Can Manufacturers Institute, 7-Eleven Convenience Stores, and Yum! Brands.

Its domain name, www.nofoodtaxes.com, was formerly registered to Goddard Claussen public relations, based in Washington, D.C. The website's domain registration has since changed to Domains By Proxy, Inc., which allows registrants to remain anonymous.
Ties run long and deep between the beverage industry and Goddard Claussen. According to her bio, American Beverage Association President Susan Neely previously worked for Health Insurance Association of America and "created and managed numerous issues campaigns, including the award winning 'Harry and Louise' TV commercials and campaign" in 1994, which was created by Goddard Claussen.
With the beverage industry on overdrive to halt sugary drink taxes and now the Bloomberg portion cap proposal, it's not surprising that almost everywhere a soda tax or portion cap has been proposed, an anti-soda tax or anti-portion cap coalition and website has quickly appeared. In Richmond, Calif., which will have a soda tax measure on the November ballot, the Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes, was recently created by the beverage industry. The coalition's website domain is registered under Goddard Claussen Public Affairs in Washington.
Anti-soda tax coalitions have also been created in the following locales. Note the similarities in many of the domain names:
The deep-pocketed American Beverage Association, which is funded by Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Dr. Pepper/Snapple and others, has been successfully framing the sugary beverage tax issue across the nation with the help of astroturf coalitions created by Goddard Claussen/Goddard Gunster. Mayor Bloomberg's recent portion cap proposal is getting the same treatment with the industry's creation of New Yorkers for Beverage Choices. Until public health advocates can effectively undermine the legitimacy of these phony "grassroots" coalitions, Big Beverage will continue to have the messaging advantage.


Follow Nancy Huehnergarth on Twitter: www.twitter.com/nyshepa