Monday, 29 December 2014

Stigma Against Fat People the Last Acceptable Prejudice, Studies Find

Stigma Against Fat People the Last Acceptable Prejudice, Studies Find

PHOTO: Kenlie Tiggeman from New Orleans is suing Southwest Airlines for "discriminatory actions" after a gate agent told her she was "too fat to fly."
At a time when obesity is seen as a serious public health threat, research has found a growing prejudice against fat people.
Last week, the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University published a study suggesting that male jurors didn't administer blind justice when it came to plus-size female defendants.
Female jurors displayed no prejudice against fat defendants but men -- especially lean men -- were far more likely to slap a guilty verdict on an overweight woman and were quicker to label her a repeat offender with an "awareness of her crimes."
Another recent study by the Center for Creative Leadership found that top managers with a high body mass index were judged more harshly and seen as less effective than their slimmer colleagues by their peers, both at work and in interpersonal relationships.
Rebecca Puhl, one of the Yale researchers who co-wrote the juror study, said these displays of fat stigma are par for the course.
"Thinness has come to symbolize important values in our society, values such as discipline, hard work, ambition and willpower. If you're not thin, then you don't have them," she said.
Previous research by Puhl and her associates found that prejudice against fat people was pervasive and translated into inequities across broad areas of life.
Some examples: Fifty percent of doctors found that fat patients were "awkward, ugly, weak-willed and unlikely to comply with treatment" and 24 percent of nurses said they were repulsed by their obese patients. Nearly 30 percent of teachers said that becoming obese was "the worst thing that can happen to someone" – and more than 70 percent of obese people said they had been ridiculed about their weight by a family member.
Heavy-Duty Stereotypes
Kenlie Tiggeman, a political consultant who lives in New Orleans, said she's never needed a study to highlight hostility against fat people. As someone who has lost 120 pounds but has a 100 more to lose, she lives it.
Last year Tiggeman was thrown off a Southwest Airlines flight not once but twice because the carrier deemed her "too fat to fly." According to Tiggeman and witnesses, she was stopped at the gate both times by airline employees who proceeded to quiz her loudly about her weight and dress size before denying her boarding access.
Far from being an isolated incidence, Tiggeman said the experience was symptomatic of what she encounters every day.
"Just last week I was at the swimming pool in my gym when I overheard a woman on her cell tell a friend she was whale watching," Tiggeman said. "She was looking right at me. I know she was talking about me."
People have no qualms aiming such overt cruelty at obese people, Puhl said, because there are few consequences. She said that fat stigma is rarely challenged and often ignored. In effect, it's the last acceptable prejudice.
"There are no federal laws on the books that make it illegal to discriminate on the basis of body weight, so on the whole it remains legal. That sends a message that it's no big deal," said Puhl.
Puhl suspects that public health campaigns branding obesity as a disease are sometimes perceived as criticizing individuals rather than the environmental and social factors that lead to weight gain. This, she said, gives some people license to engage in public fat-shaming.
She also believes media portrayals of heavy people as fat, lazy and gluttonous do them no favors.
"Overweight people are usually shown in stereotypical ways -- engaged in out of control eating or bingeing on junk food -- and they are often shown as the target of humor or ridicule," she pointed out. "With the amount of media we all consume, it's no wonder these stereotypes stick."
Big Changes Needed
Puhl said because of the public's belief that obesity is a temporary condition completely under an individual's control, fat people didn't get much sympathy, even from others struggling with their own weight.
"For things to change there needs to be a greater understanding of how complex the condition is and how hard it is to reverse," she said.
Even as obesity rates continue to soar, Puhl hasn't seen much improvement in public perception except for a few glimmers of hope in the workplace and health care environment.
Tiggeman, for one, is fighting back. She's suing Southwest, not for monetary gain but to force the airline industry to address its policies regarding overweight passengers, she said.
"I have no problem being held to a standard, but I think that standard shouldn't be applied arbitrarily based on how an airline employee feels about my size," she said. "We need to know if we need one seat or two, because this eyeballing happening at the gate is incredibly discriminatory, and it's so unnecessary."
Tweet chat: Why Are We Fat and What Can We Do About It?
To raise public awareness about obesity prevention and treatment, Dr. Richard Besser, ABC News' chief health and medical correspondent, will host a one-hour "tweet chat" on Twitter today from 1-2 p.m. ET. To participate, sign into Twitter and click here for the hashtag. Follow the conversation or jump in with comments and questions of your own.
Medical experts from the American Council on Exercise, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Center for Science in the Public Interest and Cornell University will join Besser on the chat to answer your questions and offer advice.

Friday, 19 December 2014

Half of Dr. Oz’s advice is baseless or wrong, Canadian researchers find


Half of Dr. Oz’s advice is baseless or wrong, Canadian researchers find

 

 Link to the BMJ Study:

http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g7346 

Medical research doesn't back up — or flat-out contradicts — what the TV doctor says, study published in BMJ reports

Dr. Mehmet Oz, chairman and Professor of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington in June about deceptive weight-loss products.
Lauren Victoria Burke / AP
Dr. Mehmet Oz, chairman and Professor of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington in June about deceptive weight-loss products.
It’s not hard to understand what makes Dr. Oz so popular. Called “America’s doctor,” syndicated talk-show host Mehmet Oz speaks in a way anyone can understand. Medicine may be complex. But with Dr. Oz, clad in scrubs and crooning to millions of viewers about “miracles” and “revolutionary” breakthroughs, it’s often not.
He somehow makes it fun. And people can’t get enough.
“I haven’t seen a doctor in eight years,” The New Yorker quoted one viewer telling Oz. “I’m scared. You’re the only one I trust.”
But is that trust misplaced? Or has Oz, who often peddles miracle cures for weight loss and other maladies, mortgaged medical veracity for entertainment value?
These questions have hammered Oz for months. In June, he was hauled in front of the U.S. Congress, where Sen. Claire McCaskill told him he gave people false hope and criticized his segments as a “recipe for disaster.” Then last month, a study he widely trumpeted lauding coffee bean weight-loss pills was retracted despite Oz’s assertions it could “burn fat fast for anyone who wants to lose weight.”
And now, his work has come under even greater scrutiny in the British Medical Journal, which on Wednesday published a study analyzing Oz’s claims along with those made on another medical talk show.
What they found wasn’t reassuring.
The Canadian researchers, led by Christina Korownyk of the University of Alberta, charged medical research either didn’t substantiate — or flat out contradicted — more than half of Oz’s recommendations.
“Recommendations made on medical talk shows often lack adequate information on specific benefits or the magnitude of the effects of these benefits,” the article said. “The public should be skeptical about recommendations made on medical talk shows.”
Oz, for his part, said he’s only trying to give people all the options out there. He said data shouldn’t stop patients from testing out things like raspberry ketone — a “miracle in a bottle to burn your fat” — even if it’s never been tested on people, according to Slate.
“I recognize that oftentimes they don’t have the scientific muster to present as fact,” Oz said at a U.S. Senate hearing, adding that he “personally believes in the items I talk about in my show.
“But, nevertheless, I give my audience the advice I give my family all the time. I give my family these products, specifically the ones you mentioned. I’m comfortable with that part.”
But the Canadian researchers weren’t nearly so comfortable. They selected 40 episodes from last year, identifying 479 separate medical recommendations. After paging through the relevant medical research, they found evidence only supported 46 per cent of his recommendations, contradicted 15 per cent and wasn’t available for 39 per cent.
The study was not without its limitations, however. The researchers conceded it was difficult to parse “what was said and what was implied.” And some of the recommendations were extremely general — “sneezing into your elbow prevents the spread of germs” — and consequently difficult to find in medical research, let alone substantiate.
Still, the article was a withering assessment of Oz and the whole doctor talk show business.
“Consumers should be skeptical about any recommendations provided on television medical talk shows, as details are limited and only a third to one half of recommendations are based on believable or somewhat believable evidence,” the paper said.
“Decisions around health care issues are often challenging and require much more than non-specific recommendations based on little or no evidence.”
But Oz considers himself an iconoclast trying to shake up a stodgy medical community.
“Much of medicine is just plain old logic,” he told The New Yorker. “So I am out there trying to persuade people to be patients. And that often means telling them what the establishment doesn’t want to hear: that their answers are not only the answers, and their medicine is not the only medicine.”
The study is part of an ongoing debate about medicine on television.
There’s clearly a market for doctor talk shows. The Dr. Oz Show ranks in the top five talk shows in the United States, bringing in a haul of roughly 2.9 million viewers per day. And the talk show The Doctors, also studied in the paper, nets around 2.3 million viewers per show.
These days, Oz considers disease in terms of marketability. Cancer, he told The New Yorker, “is our Angelina Jolie. We could sell that show every day.”
But some doctors have expressed alarm at Oz’s willingness to sell it. “Although perhaps not as ‘sexy’ as Dr. Oz would like, the public needs more information about the effects of diet as a whole on cancer risk,” commented one paper titled “Reality Check: There is no such thing as a miracle food” in the journal Nutrition and Cancer. It lambasted Oz’s assertion that endive, red onion and sea bass can decrease the likelihood of ovarian cancer by 75 per cent.
“Mehmet is now an entertainer,” New York doctor Eric Rose told The New Yorker. “And he’s great at it. People learn a lot, and it can be meaningful in their lives.
But “sometimes Mehmet will entertain wacky ideas — particularly if they are wacky and have entertainment value.”


http://www.thestar.com/life/2014/12/19/half_of_dr_ozs_advice_is_baseless_or_wrong_canadian_researchers_find.html?app=noRedirect

Rudd Center Digest December 2014

December 2014

FRONT BURNER NEWS

School Meals Critical for Low Income Adolescents 

The fruits and vegetables provided through school meals deliver an important dietary boost to low income adolescents, according to a study released in Preventive Medicine. Read more.

Current U.S. Food Supply Not Healthy 

The food supply contains too much sodium, unhealthy fat, and added sugar and not enough fruits, vegetables, and whole grains for a healthy and balanced diet, according to a report published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Read more.

Children with Obesity More Responsive to Sugar 

The brains of children with obesity are more responsive to sugar, according to a recent study from the University of California, San Diego. Read more.

Congress Eases School Food Rules 

A massive year-end spending bill recently released by Congress will not allow schools to opt out of healthier school meal standards championed by the First Lady. It would, however, ease standards that many students and school officials complained about. Read more

Addressing Weight-Based Bullying 

There is a real need to ensure that weight-based bullying is addressed on par with other forms of bullying, according to Rebecca Puhl, PhD, Rudd Center’s Deputy Director. Read more

Sleep Problems Raise Obesity Risk in Adolescents 

Sleep deprivation and sleep-related breathing problems in adolescents significantly raise their risk for obesity. Read more

Mother’s Health Impacts Child’s Weight 

A mother's health before and during pregnancy can affect her child's weight, according to a paper recently published in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Read more

VOICES

2014 Was Watershed Year for Food Politics 

With so much progress made in food policy this year, 2014 might be viewed as the watershed year for food politics, asserts Dana Woldow, School Food Advocate. Read more.

Importance of a National Soda Tax 

A national soda tax is needed to reduce obesity and save lives, according to David Lazarus, Los Angeles Times Journalist. Read more.
SUGAR-SWEETENED BEVERAGES/TAXES

Mexico’s Soda Tax is Reducing Consumption 

Mexico's soda tax is changing sugary drink consumption habits, according to health advocates. "Taxation, just like it did for tobacco, is the most effective way to get people to change their behavior," according to Barry Popkin, Professor at the University of North Carolina. Read more.  

California City Proposes Healthy Drink Defaults for Kids’ Meals 

The city of Davis, California wants water and low-fat milk to be the standard beverage offered with children’s meals at restaurants. Parents would have to request soda. Read more.  

Berkeley Mayor Begins to Implement Soda Tax 

The city of Berkeley will establish a panel of experts in health, nutrition, and education-related fields to recommend how to spend the tax revenue. Read more.

Montreal City Council to Debate Soda Tax 

Montreal city councillor Marvin Rotrand is proposing to tax sugary drinks province-wide. Read more

FOOD MARKETING

CFBAI Releases Progress Report 

The Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI) recently released a progress report on their standards for marketing to kids. While there were no compliance issues in radio or print, the evaluation acknowledges that some companies did not live up to the commitments they made for TV and digital media advertising. Read more.

Rudd Center Welcomes New Year at the University of Connecticut 

UConn_Rudd Center
The Rudd Center will move to the University of Connecticut (UConn) next month. The Center will relocate to Constitution Plaza in Hartford.
The move is one of the first major initiatives of UConn’s Academic Vision, which prioritizes health and wellness research as an integral part of the University’s mission.
Center staff and faculty look forward to a successful new year and increased opportunities to collaborate with the UConn community.  

FDA Announces Menu Labeling Regulation

Menu_labeling

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized regulations requiring chain restaurants and other retailers that sell prepared foods to put calorie labels on their menus and menu boards.

The new rules, which are part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, establish a national standard for restaurant chains with 20 or more outlets. The rules pre-empt existing state laws.
Under the new regulation, calories must be displayed on all menus and menu boards. Other nutritional information, such as calories from fat, total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, sodium, total carbohydrates, fiber, sugars and protein, must be available in writing upon request.
"Research shows that Americans consume about one-third of their calories away from home,” said Marlene Schwartz, PhD, Rudd Center Director. “By providing calorie counts on menus and menu boards, consumers will have the information they need to make informed choices."
Restaurants and other food establishments will have one year to comply with the menu labeling requirements.
In addition, vending machine operators who own or operate 20 or more vending machines must disclose calorie information on their vending machines. They will have two years to comply with the requirements.
Health experts assert the new requirements will help address the obesity epidemic by showing Americans how many calories are in the meals they eat outside of the home.  

Children’s Health Advocates to Candy Makers: Stop Marketing Junk Food to Kids

Gummy_Bears
Members of the Food Marketing Workgroup, including the Rudd Center, are urging Tootsie Roll Industries, as well as four other candy manufacturers, to do their part to curb childhood obesity and stop marketing unhealthy foods to children and to participate in a self-regulatory program that monitors food advertising aimed at kids.
The nation’s three biggest candy companies, Hershey, Mars, and Nestlé, already belong to the Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI), which is administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. However, Tootsie Roll, as well as the American Licorice Company, Haribo of America, Perfetti Van Melle, and The Topps Company do not participate.

"Advertising products that promote diabetes, obesity, and tooth decay to impressionable toddlers watching My Little Pony and Strawberry Shortcake is completely outside the boundaries of responsible corporate behavior," said Center for Science in the Public Interest Nutrition Policy Director Margo G. Wootan, in a CSPI issued press release. "More responsible companies like Hershey, Mars, and Nestlé agreed long ago to not place ads in children’s programming, but Tootsie Roll Industries is years behind."
The CFBAI Initiative is a voluntary self-regulation program comprising many of the nation's largest food and beverage companies. The Initiative is designed to shift the mix of foods advertised to children under 12 to encourage healthier dietary choices and healthy lifestyles.

Consumer, Child Health, and Privacy Groups Urge FTC to Investigate Topps Company for Violating COPPA 

The Rudd Center recently signed onto a complaint, drafted by the Georgetown University Law Center and the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), urging the Federal Trade Commission to investigate The Topps Company, Inc. (maker of Ring Pops) for various violations of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).
According to the CDD, Topps uses its child-directed website Candymania.com and social media to promote Ring Pops, a candy that appeals to children. The #RockThatRock contest encouraged children to post photos of themselves wearing Ring Pops on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram for a chance to have their photo used in a music video with tween band R5. Topps used several photos of children who were clearly under age.
The video is available on both Candymania and YouTube and has been viewed almost 900,000 times. Long after the contest ended, Topps continued to display children’s photos and contact information submitted using the #RockThatRock hashtag on the Ring Pop Facebook page.
The CDD asserts that Topps made no effort to provide notice to parents about the information collected, or to obtain advance, verifiable parental consent as required by the COPPA rule.
In addition, says the CDD, Topps violated the COPPA rule by failing to post its children’s privacy policy in a prominent manner, failing to provide a complete and understandable privacy policy, conditioning a child’s participation in the contest on disclosing more information than was reasonably necessary, and retaining children’s personal information for longer than reasonably necessary.  
New Report Ranks America’s Health
America's Health
Obesity and physical inactivity are the top health and health-related problems in the U.S., according to a new report from the United Health Foundation, the American Public Health Association, and Partnership for Prevention.
Now in its 25th year, the annual America's Health Rankings report is the nation's longest running, state-by-state snapshot of Americans’ health. According to the report, about one-third of U.S. adults said they were obese, and nearly a quarter said they had not participated in any physical activity or exercise within the past month.
The report also shows that the rate of type 2 diabetes has increased over time. Ten-percent of Americans now say they have the diet-related disease.
 
Yale_Rudd_Center
    

Leyah Shanks -Your Body is Amazing- Video


  Leyah can be reached and contacted in a number of ways and several links are below.
Published on Jul 10, 2012
I'm just sick of the bombardment we get of 'perfection', people with the 'perfect' this and 'perfect' that. The truth is, NO ONE is perfect. Nearly everyone who is presented to us by the media has either had surgery, been airbrushed or is one of those one in a billion people who have been born looking like a flawless Greek Goddess!
The images we (and our children) see of stick thin women (with hu...ge boobs, non-existent waists, massive lips, big bums, 'perfect' straight nose, legs a mile long, big eyes, eyelashes the length of a ruler, 'perfect' teeth, beautifully shaped eyebrows, with flawless skin) Are simply not reality.
Everyone's different -- we come in all different shapes and sizes - and I believe that we should be embracing individuality, not condemning it.
This has mostly been with regards to women and young girls, but it's now spreading to men and young boys. There have been an increased number of men suffering from eating disorders in the past few years and studies have shown it's largely due to the images which are all around us. This proves that it really is a problem which can affect anyone and could (and I think will) be passed down to the next generation if we don't try and do something about it now. It worries me that the children of today (THE NEXT GENERATION) are growing up with these images surrounding them. Above all, I really do not want them to think that this is the norm and is what they need to conform to in order to be 'beautiful' or even just to get ahead in life. Kids are easily persuaded, so let's educate them that size zero is not reality and that individuality is incredible!
I'm on a mission. I want to promote a HEALTHY body image throughout the modelling industry and indeed throughout the world. I want to change perceptions of 'perfection' and show that a healthy body is sexy, beautiful and desirable - and from the fashion industry's point of view; make clothes look amazing!
Women are meant to have boobs, bums and hips! In the same way that both women and men have bits they don't like, wobbly bits, hairy bits, spotty bits, scarred bits, stretch marks, 'love handles', belly 'tyres', patchy bits and any other 'imperfections' that make us a perfect version of who we are as individuals.
I want to show both genders that whether you're a size 4, 6, S, 8, 12, M, 16, L 20, 26, XL 32, XXL -- Whatever you are - you're beautiful the way you are.
People should NOT feel pressured to look a way that is unrealistic and practically unattainable. Everyone should feel at home in their own skin -- not trapped in it. It needs to be emphasised that everyone is different. We should be embracing who we are not trying to change to suit other people.
  Twitter- https://twitter.com/IAMLEYAHSHANKS

Creator of . Featured in & . and writer. blogger. Beauty is limitless.
W.WIDE Edinburgh Scotland, UK.



https://www.facebook.com/leyahshanksbcr?ref=eyJzaWQiOiIwLjg3MzI0OTA4Nzc3MTA0NTgiLCJxcyI6IkpUVkNKVEl5VEdWNVlXZ2xNakJUYUdGdWEzTWxNaklsTlVRIiwiZ3YiOiI3NDY2YzIwYWM4OWY0N2Q2MTg1ZjNhNjUxNDYxYzFiMWJhYzlhODJkIn0

Thursday, 18 December 2014

Nancy Upton, Plus-Size Model Contest Winner

American Apparel’s Lame Open Letter To Nancy Upton, Plus-Size Model Contest Winner





Last week, we became enamored with Nancy Upton, a Dallas woman in the #1 spot for American Apparel‘s plus-size model contest. The company asked bootylicious girls ages 18+ to send in photos of themselves, which they posted on their website so customers could vote on who deserved a modeling contract. Instead of a traditional modeling pic, the zaftig Nancy Upton submitted “fat girl” pics of herself bathing in ranch dressing, squirting chocolate syrup down the gullet, and posed with an apple in her mouth like a pig on a spit.
In short, it was amazing. No one could have been more thrilled than us when Nancy Upton won.
But it seems like not everyone was so happy about Nancy’s victory — namely, American Apparel corporate headquarters. We get a lot of douchey emails here at The Frisky, but this one takes the cake. After the jump, read American Apparel creative director Iris Alonzo’s nasty email (sent to us last night) about Nancy Upton, the kickass lady who won the company’s plus-size model contest fair and square. That is, until the company decided to award the prize to other contestants…

Dear Nancy Upton, My name is Iris Alonzo and I am a Creative Director at American Apparel. Along with four other women, I conceived of the Next BIG Thing campaign for American Apparel. Firstly, we are very sorry that we offended you. Our only motive was to discover and celebrate the many beautiful XL women around the globe who enjoy our brand, and to promote the recent size additions to our collection. Nothing more, nothing less. We would also like to assure you that no one is getting fired over your stunt, as you expressed concern about in a recent interview. We are fortunate to have a great boss who trusts and believes in our instincts and ideas, and we are still very excited about all of our Next BIG Things and looking forward to meeting our new XL brand ambassadors.
It’s a shame that your project attempts to discredit the positive intentions of our challenge based on your personal distaste for our use of light-hearted language, and that “bootylicous” was too much for you to handle. While we may be a bit TOO inspired by Beyoncé, and do have a tendency to occasionally go pun-crazy, we try not to take ourselves too seriously around here. I wonder if you had taken just a moment to imagine that this campaign could actually be well intentioned, and that my team and I are not out to offend and insult women, would you have still behaved in the same way, mocking the confident and excited participants who put themselves out there? Maybe you’ll find it interesting that in addition to simply responding to customer demand and feedback, when you’re a vertically-integrated company, actual jobs are created from new size additions. In this case, for the XL women who will model them, industrial workers that make them, retail employees that sell them and beyond. That’s the amazing reality of American Apparel’s business.
Though I could spend hours responding to your accusations and assumptions, this isn’t the appropriate forum for that, so I will only briefly address a few issues here. In regards to April Flores’ “that’s not our demographic” experience, I don’t recall the name of the confused employee credited with saying that, but he or she was sadly uninformed, and our company certainly does not endorse their statement. For as long as I can remember, we have offered sizes up to 3XL in our basic styles, and as far as adding larger sizes to the rest of our line is concerned, if there is the demand and manufacturing power to support it, we’re always game. There are thousands of brands in the market who have no intention of supporting natural – and completely normal – full-figured women, and American Apparel is making a conscious effort to change that, both with our models and our line. If every brand that tried to do this was met with such negative press, we may have to wait another decade for the mainstream to embrace something so simple.
In the past, American Apparel has been targeted for various reasons, many times by journalists who weren’t willing to go the extra mile to even visit the factory or meet the people in charge. Dov is a great executive director and American Industrialist, but there are hundreds of other decision-makers in our company, over half of whom are women. I suppose you have read a few too many negative pieces about us that have helped to form your opinion of who we are and what we stand for, and perhaps this has clouded your ability to give us a chance. I get it. I read some of it too. As a creative who isn’t always the most tactful and tends to stay away from the limelight, maybe I haven’t spoken up as much as I should have over the past 8 years that I’ve worked at American Apparel. Perhaps I could have shed some light on some issues that have been left cloudy over the years. However, sensational media will always need something to latch on to and success, spandex and individuality (and mutton chops circa 2004) are certainly easy targets. And who knows – maybe the PR ups and downs are all part of our DNA as a company. What I do know is that after all the years I have been working for this company I can wholeheartedly say that American Apparel is an amazing and inspiring place to work. I can’t speak for everyone, but I can represent of a ton of people I know when I say that we really like Dov and we passionately believe in his vision for a beautiful factory with sustainable practices. We are the largest sewing factory in North America, after all…10,000 jobs is nothing to sniff at. A lot of people would be very sad if this company wasn’t around.
That said, we realize that we are in no way perfect and that we’re still learning. We want to do better or differently in many areas, and we are actively working on them every day. You’re literally witnessing a transparent, sincere, innovative, creative company go through puberty in the spotlight of modern media. It’s not easy!
Oh — and regarding winning the contest, while you were clearly the popular choice, we have decided to award the prizes to other contestants that we feel truly exemplify the idea of beauty inside and out, and whom we will be proud to have representing our company.
Please feel free to contact me directly anytime. If you want to know the real scoop about our company before writing a story, I’ve got it (or if I don’t, I can put you in touch with the person that does!).
Best of luck,
Iris Alonzo
Creative Director
American Apparel
iris@americanapparel.net
Nasty, nasty and more nasty.
We are assuming that since Iris Alonzo included her email in the open letter, she would be delighted to hear from Frisky readers from her and her company’s douchey behavior. If anyone receives a response, feel free to forward to me at {encode=”jessica@thefrisky.com” title=”Jessica@TheFrisky.com”}.
Want to contact the writer of this post? {encode=”jessica@thefrisky.com” title=”Email her”}!

Monday, 15 December 2014

Countries pledge action to reduce child obesity


   Special Thanks to The Caibean Current News Source .http://thecaribbeancurrent.com/news/countries-pledge-action-to-reduce-child-obesity-in-the-americas/
    

Dr. Carissa F. Etienne, Director of the Pan American Health Organization (photo – vimeo.com)
Countries of the Americas took a giant step forward in the fight against the rising epidemic of obesity when they unanimously signed the new 5-year plan of action for the prevention of obesity in children and adolescents. This was signed during the 53rd Directing Council of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), which was also the 66th Session of the Regional Committee of WHO for the Americas. Alongside other measures, the plan calls for fiscal policies and regulation of food marketing and labelling, improvement of school nutrition and physical activity environments, and promotion of breastfeeding and healthy eating. Its goal is to halt the rise of the obesity epidemic so that obesity prevalence in each country does not increase further.

Photo – Matthias Kulka/Corbis
The prevalence of overweight and obesity is highest in the Americas compared with other WHO regions. 62% of adults aged older than 20 years in the region are overweight or obese. In three countries—Chile, Mexico, and the USA—obesity and overweight now affect about seven out of ten adults. 20–25% of children aged younger than 19 years in Latin America are overweight or obese.
Rates are increasing sharply and rapidly, even in the youngest age groups. According to PAHO calculations based on data from demographic and health surveys from 1992 to 2012, in children aged 5 years and younger, obesity and overweight rates more than tripled in the Dominican Republic between 1991 and 2013 (from 2•2 to 7•3%), and doubled in El Salvador between 1993 and 2008 (from 1•5 to 3%). In seven eastern Caribbean countries, rates of overweight and obesity in children aged 4 years and younger doubled in just 10 years, from 7•4% in 2000 to 14•8% in 2010.4 In adolescents (aged 12–19 years) of both sexes, obesity rates increased by 20%, from 17•4% in 2003 to 20•5% in 2012 in the USA.5 In adolescent girls (aged 15–20 years), overweight and obesity rates have risen steadily over the past two decades—eg, in Bolivia, from 21•1% to 42•7%; in Guatemala, from 19•6% to 29•4%; and in Peru, from 22•0% to 28•5%.
Countries in the Americas recognise that to fight this epidemic, more is needed than mere public education about the importance of healthy habits. Aggressive measures are needed and are now being taken. These measures include fiscal and regulatory measures, such as taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages and energy-dense nutrient-poor products that aim to reduce consumption (in Mexico); new policies to improve the school food environment, particularly foods sold in schools (in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, the USA, and Uruguay); regulations on food marketing to children (in Brazil, Chile, and Peru); mandatory front-of-package, easy-to-understand labelling of processed food products (in Ecuador); and comprehensive frameworks for promotion of healthy weight on the basis of multisectoral partnerships (in Canada and the USA).
For child and adolescent obesity to be addressed, sustained multisectoral actions are also needed from the public and nongovernmental sectors and, when appropriate, the private sector. Two key areas addressed by the PAHO plan of action are provision of urban spaces for physical activity and measures to increase the availability of and access to nutritious foods. Promotion of public spaces and improvement of public transport systems help increase physical activity. Interventions to improve production, storage, and distribution systems for natural, whole foods are also important; family farming initiatives are a good example.
To support countries in implementation of the plan of action,1 PAHO is providing evidence-based information for development of policies and regulations, regional nutrition guidelines for preschool and school feeding programmes, and guidelines for food and drink sold in schools. Additionally, PAHO is supporting adoption of indicators of obesity, will develop and maintain a database of nationally representative figures on overweight and obesity prevalence, and will monitor activities related to implementation of policies, laws, and programmes in the Americas. Through unanimous approval of the PAHO plan of action, governments in the Americas have set an example of leadership to protect children and adolescents from one of the most serious health threats facing present and future generations.
Carissa F. Etienne, Director of the Pan American Health Organization.
Source: The Lancet