New Soda Tax Makes Mexico a
Leading Guardian of Public Health 
Amelia
Earhart: "Never interrupt someone doing what you said couldn't be
done."
Posted:
11/22/2013 6:33 pm 
Follow

Food, Health, Mexico, Junk Food, Coke, El Poder Del Consumidor, Healthy Eating, Kids Health, Public Health, Soda, Soda Tax, Sugar, World News 
30
Get World
Newsletters: 
This
month the new government of Mexico made history. In the country that consumes
more soda per capita than any in the world, where the former president had been
the top executive for Coca-Cola, the national Congress struck a blow for public
health by passing a one-peso-per-liter tax on soda and an 8 percent tax on junk
food. We in the U.S. can learn a lot from our neighbor to the south--as well as
from countries including Finland, Hungary and France that have passed similar
measures. Even England's Conservative Party-led government is considering such
a tax.
All these
countries understand the toll that rising rates of diabetes, heart disease and
other chronic conditions are having on the health of their people and on
national medical costs. They understand that they are facing a public health
crisis and that strong regulatory action can discourage soda and junk-food
consumption and save lives.
The
Mexican soda tax, which will go into effect Jan. 1 2014, applies to all foods
with added sugar, not including milk or yogurt. The junk-food tax is on
high-calorie foods that pack 275 or more calories into 100 grams of food
including chips, candies, pudding, peanut and hazelnut butters, milk, sugary
cereals and ice cream. Meanwhile, federal regulators have announced their
intention to issues rules to regulate TV advertising of junk food products that
would ban ads for sugary drinks, fried foods and other unhealthy food items from
appearing on television at certain times of day when large numbers of children
watch. 
One of
the organizations that has helped lead this struggle is called El Poder del
Consumidor--Consumer Power in English--and shortly after the historic vote, I
was fortunate enough to meet and appear at a press conference with the group's
leaders and its allies in a coalition called the Nutritional health Alliance.
El Poder del Consumidor is headed by Alejandro Calvillo Unna, the former leader
of Greenpeace Mexico, who wants to make the group a potent consumer's voice and
help create a Mexican movement for community health and wellbeing.
I believe
this effort is historic and can begin to reshape public attitudes towards
community health and the conditions that promote it. I know the kind of impact
that local and state restrictions and taxes had on reducing cigarette use in
the U.S., protecting millions of people. We know taxes reduce
consumption-especially among young and low-income people who have less
disposable income and are more sensitive to price increases. We also know that
media coverage of the tax is leading to lots of ongoing discussion and bringing
issues about the risks of unhealthy food to a broader audience.
I also
believe that all of this will reduce the consumption of junk food and soda--and
all the sugar and 'wasted calories' these foods and drinks contain--helping
slow the dramatic rise in diabetes, stroke and other chronic diseases that is
taking place in so many countries. While the revenue from the tax has not
specifically been earmarked to support health efforts, legislation is pending
in the Mexican Congress to provide at least 3.5 billion pesos (about $270
million) to install water fountains in schools.
The
Mexican legislation is one big step towards slowing and reversing the epidemic
of unnecessary and preventable disease. We know that changing attitudes and
ideas about health and healthy environments is a slow process that will build
over time. I believe this action will have a positive impact, and that as
people see this--and understand that the right policy changes can improve
public health--it will lead to follow-on work in Mexico and similar efforts
throughout Latin America. 
My hope
is that the audaciousness of Mexico's action also will trigger more activity
here in the U.S. The big soda and food companies have increasingly been using
racially charged divide-and-conquer tactics, suggesting that soda or junk-food
taxes are a "nanny state" idea advanced by white liberals that will
unfairly harm black and Latino families. Mexico's new law turns this idea on
its head. El Poder del Consumidor and its allies have pushed the soda and
junk-food taxes precisely because of the links between poverty and health and
precisely because people of color--indigenous people in the Mexican
context--bear the greatest burden of an unhealthy food environment that leaves
drinking water largely unavailable while Cokes and fast-food restaurants are
ubiquitous.
The soda
industry, dominated by Coca Cola, lobbied heavily against the measure. The main
television stations refused to carry advertising in favor of the soda tax,
while running lots of ads from industry opponents. So El Poder del Consumidor
and its allies ran a grassroots campaign and used cable TV, radio commercials, subway
publicity and billboards with message like "In your right mind, would you
give your child 12 teaspoons of sugar?" to promote the cause. Bloomberg
Philanthropies, the foundation of Michael Bloomberg, helped support the effort
as part of its $10 million commitment aimed at helping reduce obesity in
Mexico. Bloomberg's role drew attacks from critics for getting involved in
another country. Personally, I find that argument rather silly, given that
Coca-Cola, a US-based multinational, controls 75 percent of the Mexican
beverage market and helped bankroll the opposition to the tax.
El Poder
del Consumidor deserves a lot of credit for taking the kind of bold steps that
have been stymied so far in the U.S. (but are certain to break through sometime
soon). In the years I spent working with allies in the movement to control
tobacco, we often were told that proposals to ban smoking in restaurants,
public buildings or bars just couldn't be done and would never happen. As
Poder's Rebecca Berner said at our meeting last week, quoting Amelia Earhart:
"Never interrupt someone doing what you said couldn't be done."
 
No comments:
Post a Comment