| 
                                        
                                            | 
                                                    
                                                        | 
    
            | 
    
        | 
                
                    |   |  
                
                    | Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Succeeding But Efforts Needed to Improve Nutrition Quality 
 The federal Supplemental Nutrition Program (SNAP), commonly referred to 
as the food stamp program, is successful in alleviating hunger and 
helping lower-income Americans afford enough calories, according to a new study by the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity at the University of Connecticut. The study, published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
 found that the amount of calories consumed is about the same for SNAP 
participants compared to higher-income Americans. However, according to 
lead study author Tatiana Andreyeva, the Rudd Center's Director of 
Economic Initiatives, "... SNAP participants' diets are of lower 
nutritional quality than those of income-eligible and higher-income non 
participants." This new comprehensive review, she said, can help SNAP 
advocates and policy makers ensure that future policies related to this 
vital food assistance program address dietary quality while continuing 
to reduce food insecurity.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |  |  |  
    
            | 
    
        | 
                
                    |   |  
                
                    | Children's Exposure to TV Ads for Candy Increased Substantially After Companies Promised Not to Advertise to Kids 
 Despite voluntary pledges from candy makers not to advertise to children
 11 and under, children viewed substantially more TV ads for candy than 
they did four years earlier, when the promises went into effect, according to a new study by the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity at the University of Connecticut. From
 2008 to 2011, children's exposure to candy ads on U.S. TV increased 74 
percent, according to the study, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson 
Foundation and the Rudd Foundation, and published in the journal Appetite.
 "Although companies that belong to the (voluntary program) publicly 
state that candy should not be advertised directly to children, these 
findings clearly demonstrate that they have found many ways to advertise
 candy to children without technically violating their pledges not to do
 so," said Jennifer Harris, the study's lead author and the Rudd 
Center's Director of Marketing Initiatives.
 |  |  |  
    
            | 
                    
                        | 
Rudd Center in the News
 
 
 
Time magazine featured our new study on children's exposure to TV ads for candy, in a Sept. 10 article headlined, "Kids See More Candy Ads on TV Now Than in The Past."
  The study shows that candy companies were exploiting loopholes in the 
voluntary pledges they made not to advertise candy to young children, 
and the need for tightening the definition of child-directed advertising
 so that the pledges are meaningful.
UConn Today published a Sept. 11 piece on the report, "Empty Promises: Kids' Exposure to TV Ads for Candy."  Medical Daily also covered the new report on Sept. 11. Study author and Rudd Center Research Associate Megan LoDolce was quoted, "Despite candy companies' promises in 2007 to not advertise to children under 12 on TV, children saw substantially more." 
MSN ran a Sept. 8 article on how fat-shaming can lead to weight gain. Rudd Center Deputy
 Director Rebecca Puhl is quoted in this story, "Stigma and 
discrimination are really stressors, and, unfortunately, for many 
people, they're chronic stressors. And we know that eating is a common 
reaction to stress and anxiety --- that people often engage in more food
 consumption or more binge eating in response to stressors, so there is a
 logical connection here in terms of some of the maladaptive coping 
strategies to try to deal with the stress of being stigmatized." New York Magazine published the story on Sept. 8.
Slate published
 an article on fat-shaming on Sept. 11, explaining how weight bias and 
stigma can impact health and behaviors. "When people are made to feel 
stigmatized or shamed, they are more likely to turn to food or avoid 
physical activity," Dr. Puhl said in the piece. "Individual choices and 
behavior are small pieces in a larger puzzle, and if we focus on them 
we're ignoring everything else."
  
Rudd Center Director Marlene Schwartz commented in a Sept. 10 CNN Money 
 article on the staggering number of school children receiving free 
lunch. "I think that the people that are trying to make those small 
amounts of money stretch and feed all of these children have one of the 
hardest jobs...It would be great if there was more funding for them."
  |  |  
    
            | 
                    
                        | 
What's Simmering with Our Friends
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
  |  |  |  |  | 
No comments:
Post a Comment