Overprotective parents harming kids' long-term health: report
This is a report card on Physical Activity . I wonder how the food environment would measure up in a report card . Let's expand our thinking to explore the food environment at hospitals, drugstores, child cenetered community buildings just to name a few . Tobacco machines were removed when legisaltion began to percalate in Canada. Who are the forces hinged onto Physical Activity ? We can do better and everyday we sit and simply blame the obesity crisis onto the individual is a missed opportunity to create real change . Paul Murphy
Health Canada just dolled out 4.5 Million Dollars on Weight Loss Research. How bout some dollars on Prevention ala Tobacco Legislation in Canada.
http://www.participaction.com/report-card-2015/report-card/
Obesity Thunder Bay works to confront the issue of obesity through Shared Accountability and Responsibility. To effect social change through advocacy, research, education, and the elimination of unhealthy food environments.Health and Health Equity that promotes a conversation with regard to the food environment. Can we use and learn from our health efforts that has addressed Tobacco?
Showing posts with label Sugar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sugar. Show all posts
Tuesday, 9 June 2015
Monday, 1 June 2015
Health Digest - May 2015- UCONN Rudd Center For Food Policy and Obesity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Too many newsletters? You can unsubscribe.
|
Monday, 25 May 2015
What's a Food Industry to Do? Dr Yoni Freedhoff
Published on Dec 10, 2012
I'd
been asked by the food industry to give this talk at an industry
breakfast, but 3 days prior to the event they got cold feet and
dis-invited me. The good news is, the internet's a much larger audience
than a room full of food industry folks who likely wouldn't have cared
much about what I had to say in the first place. So here's my take on
what the food industry can do, why they're not going to do it, and what
we can do about it.
Labels:
Body Image,
Education,
GMO,
Health,
Nestle,
Obese,
Obesity,
Sugar,
Teens Body Image,
Weightloss
Thursday, 21 May 2015
Curbing global sugar consumption | World Cancer Research Fund
Curbing global sugar consumption | World Cancer Research Fund
Canada just gave 4.5 Million $$$ to conduct research on Weight Loss Surgery. I am pretty dumb when it comes to this type of surgery so I need to ask a question. How does one Not lose weight when the body environment is altered? How does this reflect on Prevention ? Paul Murphy
Just a few Ideas from the article :
Canada just gave 4.5 Million $$$ to conduct research on Weight Loss Surgery. I am pretty dumb when it comes to this type of surgery so I need to ask a question. How does one Not lose weight when the body environment is altered? How does this reflect on Prevention ? Paul Murphy
Just a few Ideas from the article :
- school nutrition standards in Queensland, Australia
- a vending machine ban in France
- a front-of-package symbol that led to product reformulation
- soda taxes in France and Mexico
- a programme targeting retail environments in New York City, USA
- a programme promoting increased water consumption in schools in Hungary
- school fruit and vegetable programmes in Netherlands and Norway
- a healthy marketing campaign in Los Angeles County, USA
- a comprehensive nutrition and health programme in France
Tuesday, 19 May 2015
Can Mexico Fight Obesity ?
If you want to see and witness legislative action to address Health and Health Equity just explore how Canada has taken on Tobacco. Despite countless reports and warnings Canada refuses to use Tobacco Tactics to address Diabetes and JunkFood consumption. They have funded reasearch on weight Loss Surgery. Paul Murphy

This
report originally aired on February 16, 2014.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: Every Sunday in
Mexico City tens of thousands answer their president’s challenge: to exercise
one hour a day. Mexico’s health ministry says its citizens are too fat.
Yoga
class along the city’s main Reforma Avenue. Nearby, Zumba. Five straight hours
of Latin American dance and aerobics. All overseen by Horacio de la Vega,
a Mexican pentathlete in two Olympics.
You see
that 30 percent of people in Mexico are obese and 70percent are
overweight.
HORACIO
DE LA VEGA, MEXICO CITY INSTITUTE OF SPORT: Yes.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: And
you’re an Olympic athlete. How do you feel about that?
HORACIO
DE LA VEGA: It’s
a very important problem. It’s sad that we actually came to this point. It’s
painful, but it has a lot to do with education, with the culture, and we’re
trying to make a lot of efforts to make this revert.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: We
met Diana Cardona at the Zumba dance. At barely five feet, this thirty year old
mother has struggled with her weight her whole life. Zumba has helped her lose
20 pounds — she’s hoping to lose 20 more. The Zumba class is certainly
hard to resist — a catchy part of what Mexico calls its three pillars to fight
obesity.
So this
is the pillar number one: more exercise for the people. I think I’ve lost a
little bit of weight. Maybe.
After
more sport comes number two: a healthier diet. But it’s pillar number three
that has the whole world watching.
Taxation
of junk food. With one and a half billion people overweight around the globe,
Mexico’s battle of the bulge has become a test case in the fight against
obesity. The new taxes are: eight per cent on food high in saturated fat, sugar
and salt, like sweet breads and cakes. About nine per cent on sugary
drinks like cola.
LUIS
VIDEGARAY, SECRETARY OF FINANCE AND PUBLIC CREDIT, MEXICO: We’re doing a lot of
education programs, health programs to change the habits of people, but we are
also using incentives, and taxes can be powerful incentives. I’m an economist,
so I believe in incentives, and I think this should have an effect on how
people select what to drink and what to eat.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: Commercials
pound the message: exercise and eat healthy, every day, similar to the New York
anti-obesity message of former Mayor Michael Bloomberg. And that’s no
coincidence. Bloomberg’s philanthropic organization has pledged $10 million
dollars to help finance Mexico’s anti-obesity campaign.
Jorge
Romo, chief lawyer for Mexico’s beverage industry association, says that since
the taxes were introduced January the first this year, consumption is already
down five per cent — but he believes it will go up again.
JORGE
ROMO, MEXICAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOFT DRINKS AND CARBONATED WATER: We are not convinced that
by putting a new tax for soft drinks, in addition to other taxes that they
already pay, it’s going to be a solution. And the reason is that it’s an old
customs — custom in Mexico to drink soft drinks.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: But
that’s exactly the point, isn’t it? To reduce the consumption of sugar because
sugar leads to obesity.
JORGE
ROMO: Yes,
but if you taxed only the drinks which are bottled, then why not the other
ones? There is an unequitable situation. And in talking of equity, that’s a
main reason that the tax might be unconstitutional, because you cannot tax some
product and the other ones not.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: What
Romo’s getting at: the new tax only levies extra pesos on bottled or canned
soft drinks and packaged snacks, not the fatty foods and drinks sold on the
street.
Still
Mexicans drink more Coca Cola products per capita than anyone else in the
world. Visiting a mobile health clinic, Maria Castillo has had hypertension for
23 years and diabetes for five.
How much
Coca Cola do you drink every day?
For the
family, three liters she says.
Three
liters a day? Three liters of Coca Cola, so it’s one liter a day each person
more or less?
She says,
yes it’s bad. And tortilla and bread. That’s what makes us fat.
Mexico’s
Coca Cola franchise declined our interview request. But industry lawyer Romo —
who represents Coke among other brands — says the soft drink companies aren’t
the only culprits in the obesity crisis.
But it’s the
amount of sugar — there is so much sugar in these drinks.
JORGE
ROMO: Maybe
it is the amount of sugar, but if it is the only energy they consume, they eat
or they drink, so no problem. And if they exercise no problem at all. It’s very
expensive to buy fruit, to buy vegetables, so they only eating fried food.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: With
fifty percent of Mexicans living below the poverty line, cost is critical.
Doesn’t
it just make it more expensive for the people who can’t afford to buy anything
else?
LUIS VIDEGARAY,
SECRETARY OF FINANCE AND PUBLIC CREDIT, MEXICO: But there are alternatives.
The taxes — the taxes are only taxing high calorie foods and sugary drinks.
There are other foods and other drinks available that are not being taxed, and
we want exactly that shift in consumption patterns.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: Perhaps
easier said than done, especially in a country where even locals shy away from
the tap water, often leaving bottled drinks as the only option.
Back at
home, Diana from Zumba class has changed her eating habits over the past year.
The children eat rice, tomatoes, peas, tortilla, and guacamole. A year ago it
was fries, takeaway pizzas, hamburgers, cans of cola. If she hadn’t gone on the
diet, she says, I’d be this big! And she feels better. Look at the badge behind
her.
‘Me
siento magnifico.’ That’s
Spanish for ‘I feel magnificent.’
DIANA
CARDONA: Whoo!
Si! Yes!
MARTIN
FLETCHER: It’s
too early to say what the effect of taxation will be as a tool against obesity.
Even its supporters say an increase of eight to ten percent is just not enough,
but the government argues it’s the message that counts. Healthy eating saves
lives.
In a
local initiative by Mexico City, for those who don’t go to the gym, the gym
comes to them. Three hundred so-called urban gyms were set up last year, three
hundred more will be opened this year, and the same again next year.
With
medical and psychological advice, and check-ups, all provided free by the city.
Prevention, the mayor says, is cheaper than treatment.
Maria
Gonzales is the city psychologist in charge of these urban gyms.
MARIA
GONZALES, MEXICO CITY GOVERNMENT: We want the people to be healthy.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: And
when you see the people come to you, are they healthy?
MARIA
GONZALES: Most
of them no. But they come here and they start wanting to have a better way of
living. A healthy life, a healthy style of living.
MARTIN
FLETCHER: The
biggest challenge is to start them young – all research shows that if a child
is overweight at age five, most always will be. Esperanza and Citlali are five
– they don’t know much about new taxes – but the government says higher taxes
on junk food will make families buy less – and their children will be
healthier, and live longer.
Labels:
Overweight,
Policies,
Smoking,
Soda,
Stigma,
Sugar,
Water,
Weight Loss
Monday, 18 May 2015
Target is making a big shift away from sugary cereals, canned foods and mac and cheese - The Washington Post
Target is making a big shift away from sugary cereals, canned foods and mac and cheese - The Washington Post
"This is a dramatic move for Target," said Koo. "And I think that all
retailers will soon be asking similar questions of these companies."
This may turn out to be a monumental shift in the food environment. Paul Murphy
Target is making a big shift away from sugary cereals, canned foods and mac and cheese
"This is a dramatic move for Target," said Koo. "And I think that all
retailers will soon be asking similar questions of these companies."
This may turn out to be a monumental shift in the food environment. Paul Murphy
Wednesday, 6 May 2015
Fat Hatred and Bashing the Obese by Paul Murphy
THUINDER BAY, ON --- November 10, 2010 ---- Our health care agencies in
Thunder Bay, are under attack, due to this impending obesity crisis.
The issue could not be simpler, and yet we are losing the battle.
Perhaps we are misguided by special interest groups. Many heavily
funded programs continue to focus solely on physical activity, and very
little else. The root cause of obesity may be misinformation, and our
stats that continue to grow and grow are due to our misguided work
plan. How does addressing physical activity, successfully, address the
issue? Bashing the obese and spreading fat hatred is a regular
occurrence within the media. Programs such as The Biggest Loser, only
add to the already complex situation. The goal is to raise the level of
awareness, and try to promote the conversation about this practice.
Why are the obese the targets, and how can we begin to address this
issue?
The issue could not be simpler, and yet we are losing the battle.
Perhaps we are misguided by special interest groups. Many heavily
funded programs continue to focus solely on physical activity, and very
little else. The root cause of obesity may be misinformation, and our
stats that continue to grow and grow are due to our misguided work
plan. How does addressing physical activity, successfully, address the
issue? Bashing the obese and spreading fat hatred is a regular
occurrence within the media. Programs such as The Biggest Loser, only
add to the already complex situation. The goal is to raise the level of
awareness, and try to promote the conversation about this practice.
Why are the obese the targets, and how can we begin to address this
issue?
The couch potato myth continues to be promoted by the media, food
industry and weight loss industry. This myth continues to shift and scheme to
avoid accountability. All three have a major interest in suppressing
the environmental action plan necessary. The lifestyle tool has been
brilliant, because it shifts any notion of accountability away from the
food giants. Lifestyle is blame and blame restricts the conversation.
How can we sit by and allow a child be victimized for obesity? Some
of our children may never recover from the brutality supported by the
media. They have simply stopped trying, and this is a tragedy. The try
harder message heavily supported by the weight loss industry continues
to play loudly. Why is there so much pressure to avoid discussing the
food environment? The weight loss industry has continued to flourish,
and many programs are owned by the food giants, and they continue to
have a failing rate of ninety-five percent. But it is you that are the
one left with feeling like a failure. If only you had more will power
and a desire for a lifestyle change.
avoid accountability. All three have a major interest in suppressing
the environmental action plan necessary. The lifestyle tool has been
brilliant, because it shifts any notion of accountability away from the
food giants. Lifestyle is blame and blame restricts the conversation.
How can we sit by and allow a child be victimized for obesity? Some
of our children may never recover from the brutality supported by the
media. They have simply stopped trying, and this is a tragedy. The try
harder message heavily supported by the weight loss industry continues
to play loudly. Why is there so much pressure to avoid discussing the
food environment? The weight loss industry has continued to flourish,
and many programs are owned by the food giants, and they continue to
have a failing rate of ninety-five percent. But it is you that are the
one left with feeling like a failure. If only you had more will power
and a desire for a lifestyle change.
There are many gifted and talented people working on the childhood
obesity issue. However, a single pair of eyeglasses does effectively correct
the vision of all who need them. Each person has their own food
experience and relationship, and for some this has been a long standing
struggle. For many, obesity could not be simpler; spouting calories in
and calories out. No one can argue with this theory, unless your food
relationship is saturated with rage and self hatred. Add to the
experience of a drug like addiction to sugar or overeating we suddenly
obtain a better vision of the complex issue. Many can barely stomach a
thought of food intake in the morning, and for those who suffer with
body image distortion, the issue is even more complex. What if we are
framing the issue all wrong? How about an environmental approach on the
issue of childhood obesity? Let’s build a community driven action plan,
and open the lines of communication.
the vision of all who need them. Each person has their own food
experience and relationship, and for some this has been a long standing
struggle. For many, obesity could not be simpler; spouting calories in
and calories out. No one can argue with this theory, unless your food
relationship is saturated with rage and self hatred. Add to the
experience of a drug like addiction to sugar or overeating we suddenly
obtain a better vision of the complex issue. Many can barely stomach a
thought of food intake in the morning, and for those who suffer with
body image distortion, the issue is even more complex. What if we are
framing the issue all wrong? How about an environmental approach on the
issue of childhood obesity? Let’s build a community driven action plan,
and open the lines of communication.
A little ‘fat talk’ is a tool that is free, and it might create the
impact needed to address childhood obesity. The concept of real health
promotion must include all aspects of the issue. Why not move past the
established media and host town hall meetings on the childhood obesity
issue? The antidote, or solution might be too close for us to actually
see, and lifestyle may be acting as a blind spot. Perhaps one day we
can examine the issue in an open free thinking forum, and as we conduct
a full and open investigation on the obesity crisis, solutions will
emerge. We can add integrity and dignity to the obesity action plan,
and those with a restricted ability will be flushed out, for their
activity, turn off the screen action plans. Children are the future and
if this food environment is hampering their health, it needs to be
changed. After all, obesity is the by product.
promotion must include all aspects of the issue. Why not move past the
established media and host town hall meetings on the childhood obesity
issue? The antidote, or solution might be too close for us to actually
see, and lifestyle may be acting as a blind spot. Perhaps one day we
can examine the issue in an open free thinking forum, and as we conduct
a full and open investigation on the obesity crisis, solutions will
emerge. We can add integrity and dignity to the obesity action plan,
and those with a restricted ability will be flushed out, for their
activity, turn off the screen action plans. Children are the future and
if this food environment is hampering their health, it needs to be
changed. After all, obesity is the by product.
Attacking the obese and labelling people of size as lazy, unhealthy,
unmotivated and have no willpower, is unacceptable. While the statistics
continue
to grow, they reflect some real truth, and that truth might indicate
that we are missing the target. The media and food environment continue
to distort any real, measurable targets that may create an impact on
obesity. The time for games is over, and we need to witness some real
action that addresses the issue of obesity. Our media needs to act like
reporters, and start investigating the obesity crisis. How can the
media distance themselves from the giants of the food industry, who
have always skilfully skirted any notion of accountability? Our
governments have created alliances with the giants of the food
industry, and because of these alliances, the physical activity crisis
has been born. Blaming the issue of obesity onto one single individual
is just fine, but how can you explain the recent Ontario statistics
that identify 70 per cent of the population to be obese? Many have
compared the food industry to the tobacco giants that had to face
legislation in order to inspire a little accountability. With all the
facts and information out there, here us a thought: Is food our next
tobacco?
to grow, they reflect some real truth, and that truth might indicate
that we are missing the target. The media and food environment continue
to distort any real, measurable targets that may create an impact on
obesity. The time for games is over, and we need to witness some real
action that addresses the issue of obesity. Our media needs to act like
reporters, and start investigating the obesity crisis. How can the
media distance themselves from the giants of the food industry, who
have always skilfully skirted any notion of accountability? Our
governments have created alliances with the giants of the food
industry, and because of these alliances, the physical activity crisis
has been born. Blaming the issue of obesity onto one single individual
is just fine, but how can you explain the recent Ontario statistics
that identify 70 per cent of the population to be obese? Many have
compared the food industry to the tobacco giants that had to face
legislation in order to inspire a little accountability. With all the
facts and information out there, here us a thought: Is food our next
tobacco?
Paul Murphy
Obesity Thunder Bay
Obesity Thunder Bay
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
