Showing posts with label Water. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Water. Show all posts

Thursday, 21 May 2015

Curbing global sugar consumption | World Cancer Research Fund

Curbing global sugar consumption | World Cancer Research Fund



  Canada just gave 4.5 Million $$$  to conduct research on Weight Loss Surgery.  I am pretty dumb when it comes to this type of surgery so I need to ask a question. How does one Not lose weight when the body environment is altered?   How does this reflect on Prevention ? Paul Murphy

         Just a few Ideas from the article :

  • school nutrition standards in Queensland, Australia
  • a vending machine ban in France
  • a front-of-package symbol that led to product reformulation
  • soda taxes in France and Mexico
  • a programme targeting retail environments in New York City, USA
  • a programme promoting increased water consumption in schools in Hungary
  • school fruit and vegetable programmes in Netherlands and Norway
  • a healthy marketing campaign in Los Angeles County, USA
  • a comprehensive nutrition and health programme in France

Tuesday, 19 May 2015

Can Mexico Fight Obesity ?



  If you want to see and witness legislative action to address Health and Health Equity just explore how Canada has  taken on Tobacco.  Despite countless reports and warnings Canada refuses to use Tobacco Tactics to address Diabetes and JunkFood consumption.  They have funded reasearch on weight Loss Surgery. Paul Murphy

Mexico2
This report originally aired on February 16, 2014.
MARTIN FLETCHER: Every Sunday in Mexico City tens of thousands answer their president’s challenge: to exercise one hour a day. Mexico’s health ministry says its citizens are too fat.
Yoga class along the city’s main Reforma Avenue. Nearby, Zumba. Five straight hours of Latin American dance and aerobics. All overseen by Horacio de la Vega, a Mexican pentathlete in two Olympics.
You see that 30 percent of people in Mexico are obese and 70percent  are overweight.
HORACIO DE LA VEGA, MEXICO CITY INSTITUTE OF SPORT: Yes.
MARTIN FLETCHER: And you’re an Olympic athlete. How do you feel about that?
HORACIO DE LA VEGA: It’s a very important problem. It’s sad that we actually came to this point. It’s painful, but it has a lot to do with education, with the culture, and we’re trying to make a lot of efforts to make this revert.
MARTIN FLETCHER: We met Diana Cardona at the Zumba dance. At barely five feet, this thirty year old mother has struggled with her weight her whole life. Zumba has helped her lose 20 pounds — she’s hoping to lose 20 more. The Zumba class is certainly hard to resist — a catchy part of what Mexico calls its three pillars to fight obesity.
So this is the pillar number one: more exercise for the people. I think I’ve lost a little bit of weight. Maybe.
After more sport comes number two: a healthier diet. But it’s pillar number three that has the whole world watching.
Taxation of junk food. With one and a half billion people overweight around the globe, Mexico’s battle of the bulge has become a test case in the fight against obesity. The new taxes are: eight per cent on food high in saturated fat, sugar and salt, like sweet breads and cakes. About nine per cent on sugary drinks like cola.
LUIS VIDEGARAY, SECRETARY OF FINANCE AND PUBLIC CREDIT, MEXICO: We’re doing a lot of education programs, health programs to change the habits of people, but we are also using incentives, and taxes can be powerful incentives. I’m an economist, so I believe in incentives, and I think this should have an effect on how people select what to drink and what to eat.
MARTIN FLETCHER: Commercials pound the message: exercise and eat healthy, every day, similar to the New York anti-obesity message of former Mayor Michael Bloomberg. And that’s no coincidence. Bloomberg’s philanthropic organization has pledged $10 million dollars to help finance Mexico’s anti-obesity campaign.
Jorge Romo, chief lawyer for Mexico’s beverage industry association, says that since the taxes were introduced January the first this year, consumption is already down five per cent — but he believes it will go up again.
JORGE ROMO, MEXICAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOFT DRINKS AND CARBONATED WATER: We are not convinced that by putting a new tax for soft drinks, in addition to other taxes that they already pay, it’s going to be a solution. And the reason is that it’s an old customs — custom in Mexico to drink soft drinks.
MARTIN FLETCHER: But that’s exactly the point, isn’t it? To reduce the consumption of sugar because sugar leads to obesity.
JORGE ROMO: Yes, but if you taxed only the drinks which are bottled, then why not the other ones? There is an unequitable situation. And in talking of equity, that’s a main reason that the tax might be unconstitutional, because you cannot tax some product and the other ones not.
MARTIN FLETCHER: What Romo’s getting at: the new tax only levies extra pesos on bottled or canned soft drinks and packaged snacks, not the fatty foods and drinks sold on the street.
Still Mexicans drink more Coca Cola products per capita than anyone else in the world. Visiting a mobile health clinic, Maria Castillo has had hypertension for 23 years and diabetes for five.
How much Coca Cola do you drink every day?
For the family, three liters she says.
Three liters a day? Three liters of Coca Cola, so it’s one liter a day each person more or less?
She says, yes it’s bad. And tortilla and bread. That’s what makes us fat.
Mexico’s Coca Cola franchise declined our interview request. But industry lawyer Romo — who represents Coke among other brands — says the soft drink companies aren’t the only culprits in the obesity crisis.
But it’s the amount of sugar — there is so much sugar in these drinks.
JORGE ROMO: Maybe it is the amount of sugar, but if it is the only energy they consume, they eat or they drink, so no problem. And if they exercise no problem at all. It’s very expensive to buy fruit, to buy vegetables, so they only eating fried food.
MARTIN FLETCHER: With fifty percent of Mexicans living below the poverty line, cost is critical.
Doesn’t it just make it more expensive for the people who can’t afford to buy anything else?
LUIS VIDEGARAY, SECRETARY OF FINANCE AND PUBLIC CREDIT, MEXICO: But there are alternatives. The taxes — the taxes are only taxing high calorie foods and sugary drinks. There are other foods and other drinks available that are not being taxed, and we want exactly that shift in consumption patterns.
MARTIN FLETCHER: Perhaps easier said than done, especially in a country where even locals shy away from the tap water, often leaving bottled drinks as the only option.
Back at home, Diana from Zumba class has changed her eating habits over the past year. The children eat rice, tomatoes, peas, tortilla, and guacamole. A year ago it was fries, takeaway pizzas, hamburgers, cans of cola. If she hadn’t gone on the diet, she says, I’d be this big! And she feels better. Look at the badge behind her.
‘Me siento magnifico.’ That’s Spanish for ‘I feel magnificent.’
DIANA CARDONA: Whoo! Si! Yes!
MARTIN FLETCHER: It’s too early to say what the effect of taxation will be as a tool against obesity. Even its supporters say an increase of eight to ten percent is just not enough, but the government argues it’s the message that counts. Healthy eating saves lives.
In a local initiative by Mexico City, for those who don’t go to the gym, the gym comes to them. Three hundred so-called urban gyms were set up last year, three hundred more will be opened this year, and the same again next year.
With medical and psychological advice, and check-ups, all provided free by the city. Prevention, the mayor says, is cheaper than treatment.
Maria Gonzales is the city psychologist in charge of these urban gyms.
MARIA GONZALES, MEXICO CITY GOVERNMENT: We want the people to be healthy.
MARTIN FLETCHER: And when you see the people come to you, are they healthy?
MARIA GONZALES: Most of them no. But they come here and they start wanting to have a better way of living. A healthy life, a healthy style of living.
MARTIN FLETCHER: The biggest challenge is to start them young – all research shows that if a child is overweight at age five, most always will be. Esperanza and Citlali are five – they don’t know much about new taxes – but the government says higher taxes on junk food will make families buy less – and their children will be healthier, and live longer.

Monday, 18 May 2015

Target is making a big shift away from sugary cereals, canned foods and mac and cheese - The Washington Post

Target is making a big shift away from sugary cereals, canned foods and mac and cheese - The Washington Post

Target is making a big shift away from sugary cereals, canned foods and mac and cheese





"This is a dramatic move for Target," said Koo. "And I think that all
retailers will soon be asking similar questions of these companies."

   

      This may turn out to be a monumental shift in the food environment. Paul Murphy

Wednesday, 6 May 2015

Fat Hatred and Bashing the Obese by Paul Murphy




Fat Hatred and Bashing the Obese

Minimize

THUINDER BAY, ON --- November 10, 2010 ---- Our health care agencies in Thunder Bay, are under attack, due to this impending obesity crisis.
The issue could not be simpler, and yet we are losing the battle.
Perhaps we are misguided by special interest groups. Many heavily
funded programs continue to focus solely on physical activity, and very
little else. The root cause of obesity may be misinformation, and our
stats that continue to grow and grow are due to our misguided work
plan. How does addressing physical activity, successfully, address the
issue? Bashing the obese and spreading fat hatred is a regular
occurrence within the media. Programs such as The Biggest Loser, only
add to the already complex situation. The goal is to raise the level of
awareness, and try to promote the conversation about this practice.
Why are the obese the targets, and how can we begin to address this
issue?
The couch potato myth continues to be promoted by the media, food industry and weight loss industry. This myth continues to shift and scheme to
avoid accountability. All three have a major interest in suppressing
the environmental action plan necessary. The lifestyle tool has been
brilliant, because it shifts any notion of accountability away from the
food giants. Lifestyle is blame and blame restricts the conversation.
How can we sit by and allow a child be victimized for obesity? Some
of our children may never recover from the brutality supported by the
media. They have simply stopped trying, and this is a tragedy. The try
harder message heavily supported by the weight loss industry continues
to play loudly. Why is there so much pressure to avoid discussing the
food environment? The weight loss industry has continued to flourish,
and many programs are owned by the food giants, and they continue to
have a failing rate of ninety-five percent. But it is you that are the
one left with feeling like a failure. If only you had more will power
and a desire for a lifestyle change.
There are many gifted and talented people working on the childhood obesity issue. However, a single pair of eyeglasses does effectively correct
the vision of all who need them. Each person has their own food
experience and relationship, and for some this has been a long standing
struggle. For many, obesity could not be simpler; spouting calories in
and calories out. No one can argue with this theory, unless your food
relationship is saturated with rage and self hatred. Add to the
experience of a drug like addiction to sugar or overeating we suddenly
obtain a better vision of the complex issue. Many can barely stomach a
thought of food intake in the morning, and for those who suffer with
body image distortion, the issue is even more complex. What if we are
framing the issue all wrong? How about an environmental approach on the
issue of childhood obesity? Let’s build a community driven action plan,
and open the lines of communication.
A little ‘fat talk’ is a tool that is free, and it might create the impact needed to address childhood obesity. The concept of real health
promotion must include all aspects of the issue. Why not move past the
established media and host town hall meetings on the childhood obesity
issue? The antidote, or solution might be too close for us to actually
see, and lifestyle may be acting as a blind spot. Perhaps one day we
can examine the issue in an open free thinking forum, and as we conduct
a full and open investigation on the obesity crisis, solutions will
emerge. We can add integrity and dignity to the obesity action plan,
and those with a restricted ability will be flushed out, for their
activity, turn off the screen action plans. Children are the future and
if this food environment is hampering their health, it needs to be
changed. After all, obesity is the by product.
Attacking the obese and labelling people of size as lazy, unhealthy, unmotivated and have no willpower, is unacceptable. While the statistics continue
to grow, they reflect some real truth, and that truth might indicate
that we are missing the target. The media and food environment continue
to distort any real, measurable targets that may create an impact on
obesity. The time for games is over, and we need to witness some real
action that addresses the issue of obesity. Our media needs to act like
reporters, and start investigating the obesity crisis. How can the
media distance themselves from the giants of the food industry, who
have always skilfully skirted any notion of accountability? Our
governments have created alliances with the giants of the food
industry, and because of these alliances, the physical activity crisis
has been born. Blaming the issue of obesity onto one single individual
is just fine, but how can you explain the recent Ontario statistics
that identify 70 per cent of the population to be obese? Many have
compared the food industry to the tobacco giants that had to face
legislation in order to inspire a little accountability. With all the
facts and information out there, here us a thought: Is food our next
tobacco?

Paul Murphy
Obesity Thunder Bay


Bookmark and Share




Monday, 4 May 2015

Dr. Cook Discusses Media and Childhood Obesity

Dr. Stephen Cook discusses the effects of media messages on the childhood obesity epidemic and what community organizations are doing to curb the negative effects of advertising unhealthy dietary choices.


    


  

Tuesday, 21 April 2015

Fed Up Feature Film Food Production

Published on May 20, 2014
This is Fed Up! Genetic Engineering, Industrial Agriculture and Sustainable Alternatives. Fed Up was released in 2002 by Wholesome Goodness Productions. More than a decade later, it still remains relevant. Most of the statistics are worse now and we are starting to see the rise of insect resistance to plants engineered to produce their own pesticides. There is still woefully little research available on long term ingestion of GMO foods and most foods in the US still are not labeled.

Description: Using hilarious and disturbing archival footage (from archive.org) and featuring interviews with farmers, scientists, government officials and activists, FED UP! presents an entertaining, informative and compelling overview of our current food production system from the Green Revolution to the Biotech Revolution and what we can do about it. FED UP! explores the unintentional effects of pesticides, the resistance of biotechnology companies to food labeling and the links between government officials and major biotechnology and chemical companies.

FED UP! answers many questions regarding genetic engineering, the Green Revolution, genetic pollution and modern pesticides through interviews with Marc Lappé and Britt Bailey from the Center for Ethics and Toxics, Peter Rosset and Anuradha Mittal from Food First, Vandana Shiva from the Research Center for Science, Technology and Ecology, Ignacio Chapela from UC Berkeley's Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, Martina McGloughlin, Director of UC Davis' Biotechnology Program and many others.FED UP! also introduces us to local Bay Area organic farmers from Purisima Greens Farm and Live Power Community Farm, presenting community supported agriculture and small- scale organic farming as real alternatives to agribusiness and industrial food.

Wednesday, 1 April 2015

Rudd Center Newsletter March 2015

Rudd Center in the News
 
  • Like tobacco, energy drinks such as Red Bull and Monster should be kept behind the counter with sales limited to adults, Jennifer Harris, UConn Rudd Center Director of Marketing Initiatives, told USA Today. The March 24 article featured our study showing that energy drinks are a growing public health threat to youth.
 
  • Keep the updated healthier school lunch standards intact: This was the rallying cry from U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and Secretary of Health and Human Services Sylvia Burwell in an opinion piece that also appeared in USA Today March 24. They cited the Rudd Center study showing students are eating more of the healthy food and throwing less food away since the new standards took effect. 
 
  • The Washington Post featured a high profile story on the Rudd Center’s study on parents’ beliefs about sugary drinks.  The findings help explain why so many provide them to their children. The March 11 article sheds light on how parents are still being misled by clever marketing.
 
  • USA Today published a hard-hitting piece on the Rudd Center study showing that many parents wrongly believe that some drinks with high amounts of added sugar are healthy options for their children. As writer Bruce Horovitz put it in the March 11 article, “Bamboozled by misleading product marketing and labeling, parents have failed to get the message that sugary drinks – beyond soda – are not healthy for kids.”
 
  • Obesity is harming the U.S. economy in surprising ways, according to a March 5 Bloomberg Business article. Among the experts quoted, Tatiana Andreyeva, the Rudd Center’s Director of Economic Initiatives, noted that obesity is correlated with an increase in absenteeism from work because of health issues.
 
  • The updated, healthier school lunch standards are a major part of First Lady Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move” campaign to fight childhood obesity – a point noted in The New York Times March 4 article on the Rudd Center study that adds to evidence that the changes can succeed in helping students eat healthier.
 
  • Time magazine’s March 4 article on the Rudd Center study showing the new healthier school lunch standards are having the desired effects included key data: “students choosing fruit in the cafeteria increased from 54 percent to 66 percent. Children are also throwing away less food, with researchers noting that students ate 84 percent of their (healthier) entrees, up from 74 percent in 2012.”
 
  • ABC News carried a piece on a Puerto Rico proposal to fine parents of obese children, which Rudd Center Deputy Director Rebecca Puhl said is "unfair and inappropriately penalizes and stigmatizes parents. Much broader societal changes are required to effectively address the challenge, as "childhood obesity is a highly complex issue."

News to Chew On


 
What's Simmering with Our Friends
 
  • The Kids’ Safe and Healthful Foods Project, a collaborative initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts, has published a handy guide for parents called How to Support Kids’ Nutrition in Your Child’s School. The guide includes a short video that explains how the updated standards are making school lunches healthier for our children.
     
 
  • Efforts by moms and dads to teach their kids about nutrition “are undermined when companies like Dr Pepper Snapple Group hawk empty calories to kids and use popular characters like the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles to do it,” says the Food Marketing Workgroup – a network of more than 200 organizations and experts dedicated to eliminating harmful food marketing. In March, the Workgroup asked Dr Pepper Snapple Group to adopt a strong policy to protect children from soda advertising.
 
  • The MomsRising Blog carried an article by the National WIC Association’s Public Policy Nutritionist, Martelle Esposito, alerting moms and mothers-to-be about a survey to help inform the association of existing gaps in knowledge regarding nutritional health and provide insights into where access to nutrition and breastfeeding services and support is lacking. 
 

 

Share With A Friend - Sign Up for Our Newsletter Here
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
Website
Website
YouTube
YouTube
Copyright © 2015 UConn Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, All rights reserved.
Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Our mailing address is:
UConn Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity
One Constitution Plaza
Suite 600
Hartford, CT 06103

Add us to your address book


unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp

Too many newsletters? You can unsubscribe.